Sunday, July 7, 2013

SEC is Told that the Costs of Implementing a Uniform Fiduciary Duty Standard is Excessive.


The largest trade organization in the securities industry has advised the Securities and Exchange Commission that implementation of a uniform fiduciary standard would impose substantial costs on brokerage firms needing to revamp their compliance procedures. 

Since Congress directed the SEC to overhaul the securities laws in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the agency has sought to establish uniform standards of care that will govern brokers who are registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) as well as investment advisors who are regulated by the SEC.  Under current law, brokers are required only to recommend investments that are “suitable,” meaning that they must only have a reasonable basis to recommend a security in light of their clients’ investment objectives and financial circumstances.  By contrast, investment advisors must adhere to a more stringent fiduciary standard of care, which imposes a duty of loyalty and requires them to act in the best interests of their clients.

According to the industry trade group, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIFMA), extending the fiduciary duty standard to registered representatives will obligate brokerage firms to expend millions of dollars to create and maintain new compliance procedures.  According to SIFMA, the cost of developing the procedures, training staff and creating new broker disclosures would cost an average of $8 million for each brokerage firm during the first year alone. 

SIFMA's cost estimate is likely to deepen the divide between proponents and opponents of the uniform fiduciary duty standard.  Recently, the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors, which opposes the SEC’s efforts to create a uniform standard, submitted a letter to the SEC contending that the rule would harm middle-income investors because the increased compliance costs would cause them to no longer service investors with modest assets.   In contrast, the Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth submitted a letter to the SEC claiming that average investors have collectively lost substantial sums of money at the hands of brokers who do not have to act in the best interests of their clients.  

Block & Landsman is a law firm focused on litigating securities law disputes.  If you believe your advisor has improperly caused investment losses, call the attorneys at Block & Landsman for a free consultation.